Taking into consideration, the mentioned scenario and the stated facts, it is apparent that though the coats sale is being offered at a discounted pricing for loyal customers for a single day. However, the advertisement specific to this doesn’t highlight about the entitlement aspect / clause for every loyal customer to get a coat, in the offered sale. Therefore, Sally the customer isn’t entitled to the coat on sale as per the contents of the advertisement.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
(Solved Homework): Dacy’s Department Store places the following advertisement in the newspaper: “ We are…
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT!
Sally isn’t entitled in view of the following points : The departmental store could claim that the offer was open for all loyal customers for that particular day and the same was dependent on stock availability.
The store can further justify that every loyal customer is equally entitled to avail benefits of sale on the specified date during their visit to the store . Hence as there is no committment as such, therefore any customer can’t expect a preferential treatment in form of entitlement to certainly have for themselves the coat on sale.
Consequently, on legal grounds Sally case / argument to sue the store would not hold weightage and it won’t be a favourable proposition / winning situation for her in the mentioned context.